![]() ![]() Therefore, international case law, State practice and academic scholarship have been especially important in determining the legal meaning and parameters of this concept. There is no treaty definition of 'armed conflict', including within the text of the Geneva Conventions 1949 or Additional Protocols 1977. (Especially helpful in the drafting of this section was Melzer, 2016). Where this threshold is not met, then the rights and treatment of individuals will be determined by human rights law and any unlawful violence will be regulated by domestic criminal law. It requires that a minimum threshold of violence is crossed first, or a military occupation occurs. IHL does not apply to all uses of inter-State confrontation nor to the employment of all forms of violence such as during riots or during isolated acts (see Additional Protocol II article 1(2)). This permits the lawful killing of some persons and destruction of certain property, whilst requiring the protection of others. Ultimately, the game forces players to work with the resources they have, not the ones they wish for.The correct categorization of whether or not an armed conflict exists is important since this will determine whether or not IHL applies. For instance, the tactically adaptive German player can adjust on the fly by discarding her whole hand, while the aggressive Soviet player receives more ambush cards. The rules are intricate but clear and logical, while hands of cards help to simulate the strengths and weaknesses of each side. ![]() Although the presentation is a little dry, “ Combat Commander: Europe” has many features of modern warfare: suppression fire, mortars, snipers, machine gun nests, smoke, artillery call-ins and command confusion. Taking the role of U.S., Soviet or German commanders leading units of about 120 soldiers, players draw cards and play them to maneuver and engage their squads of men. Asymmetric warfare – ‘Washington’s War’Īlthough set during World War II, this game gives the player an insight into the chaos of tactical combat. I have no financial or professional relationships with any of the game publishers listed these games are just personal favorites. They are rated for players, time and complexity (where “Monopoly” would score a 1 out of 5). They not only are gripping to play but also offer players a window into some core elements of modern security politics. With this in mind, I present some of my favorite war games. As the Nobel Prize-winning economist Thomas Schelling put it, “ one thing a person cannot do, no matter how rigorous his analysis or heroic his imagination, is to draw up a list of things that would never occur to him.” By facing off against opponents over a well-designed war game, people can come to see how political and military structures interact and appreciate the trade-offs and complications that come with making decisions in a competitive environment. While people may intellectually understand a problem, gaming forces them to think even harder. War games are useful intellectual aids because they force players to make decisions under pressure. Admiral Chester Nimitz observed, the conflict “ had been reenacted in the game rooms at the Naval War College by so many people and in so many different ways, that nothing happened during the war that was a surprise … absolutely nothing except the kamikaze tactics toward the end of the war.” Navy used war games to design military plans against potential adversaries. And in stepping back and analyzing what happened after a game was over, they might see what factors really mattered, and how the players’ choices influenced each other. In the early 19th century, for instance, the Prussian military required its officers to play a board game called “ Kriegsspiel.” The high command realized that while individual officers might understand the principles of combat, they might not know how to apply them when facing an actual opponent. out of Afghanistan? Confident you could keep a nation secure when multi-party international diplomacy is more important than warfare? Strategy-based board games let you test your political and military acumen right at your kitchen table – while also helping you appreciate how decision-makers are limited by the choices of others.įor centuries, military trainers have used board games as tools to help recruits and leaders alike understand fundamental principles of warfare. ![]() Want to try your hand at negotiating during a crisis? Think you have a plan that could get the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |